Cavanaugh:
A Late Prehistoric Platform Mound
in Western Arkansas

By Gregory Vogel

Home
Size and Shape of the Mound
Introduction
History of Investigations
Size and Shape of the Mound
Stratigraphy
The Artifacts
The Tunnels
The Historic Cemetery
The Gift Shop
Aerial Photographs
Viewsheds
Mounds in the Arkansas River Valley
Conclusions and Further Questions
Acknowledgments
References Cited
Gallery of All Figures

Earlier reports estimated the mound to be as little as 43 m and as much as 64 m on a side, and from 7.5 to 12 m tall (Table 1). These estimates do not appear to be based on formal data from mapping instruments, and it is unclear whether the authors used tape measures, pacing methods, or dead reckoning to come up with the numbers. It is therefore not surprising that such variation exists. A topographic map of the mound made with a total station in 2004 (Figure 12) shows the current configuration of the mound. The mound is currently about 9 m above the surrounding ground level. A broad alluvial apron of sediment surrounds the mound, extending 10 to 30 meters out from what was likely the base of the mound when it was constructed. The upper portion of the eastern face of the mound is cut and exposes a nearly vertical profile, while the lower half of the eastern face is covered by material eroded from above.


Table 1. Early descriptions of Cavanaugh Mound.

  Newkumet (1940) Shaeffer (1956) Rogers (1958)
(also in Bell [1980])
Dollar (1958)
Dimensions 61 m N/S
61 m E/W
30.5 m in diameter 49 m N/S
64 m E/W
43 m N/S
46 m E/W
Height 12 m 9.1 m 7.5 m (none given)
Dimensions of flat top 26.1 by 26.1 m (not given) 21.3 by 21.3 m 18.3 by 18.3 m
Cemetery Sketched on NE quad of summit; at least six graves shown Several from "middle 1800s" About 16 burials, 12 marked 1881 to 1895 At least 12 marked 1833 to "beginning of 20th century"
East Tunnel Shown on sketch One tunnel mentioned, no location noted. Dug 1908, 6 m long Dug 1898, m long - became potato cellar
South Tunnel Not shown on sketch Dug 1898-1908, 7.5 m long, 1.8 m square room at end. Etters unplugged tunnel and excavated further into it. Etter dug 6 m long tunnel in 1957, encountered earlier tunnel
Other Observations 1.8 m high "bench" encircling base of mound. Banding of light and dark colored fill; burned clay Visited mound in 1953 and 1958; "stratification" in 6-inch layers  

 


Figure 12. Contour map of Cavanaugh Mound
made with a total station in 2004.

The mound is about 50 meters north to south, although judging where the original mound edges were located is difficult given the current vegetation and the erosion the mound has experienced. East to west the mound is about 40 meters wide. Photographs from 1979 (see Figures 10 and 11) show the entire eastern face of the mound cut back to vertical, but the southeastern portion was not cut back as far. The projection off of the southeast corner is still expressed in the mound topography. The flattish summit portion of the mound is about 20 m side to side. There is a small, low mound off of the northeast corner of the main mound, which may be intact mound sediment, or may be spoil from the cut into the eastern side. Extrapolating from the preserved portions of the mound, its size falls well within the range given by the four early descriptions (see Table 1). Except for the cut in to the eastern side, in fact, it appears to be remarkably intact.

Newkumet's 1940 sketch shows a bench around the base of the mound that is not mentioned in any later descriptions, and it is not expressed today in the topography of the mound. It is possible that Newkumet's "bench" was actually an accumulation of eroded material, forming an alluvial apron around its base. Loose material eroded from the top and sides (and possibly backfill from the historic internments on top?) could easily account for this. Newkumet's sketch shows a very sharply defined bench, though, and it is possible that this actually existed as it was drawn in 1940 and was only obscured by erosion after then. If this is the case, Cavanaugh would be the only mound in this region for which such a feature was recorded.